Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1259

reference
484-tree-1
name
1259
tree-preservation-order

undefined

484-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023589 50.882871)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023490 50.882860,-1.023494 50.882880,-1.023508 50.882897,-1.023530 50.882911,-1.023557 50.882921,-1.023588 50.882924,-1.023619 50.882921,-1.023646 50.882912,-1.023669 50.882899,-1.023683 50.882881,-1.023689 50.882862,-1.023684 50.882842,-1.023670 50.882825,-1.023649 50.882811,-1.023621 50.882801,-1.023590 50.882798,-1.023560 50.882801,-1.023532 50.882810,-1.023509 50.882823,-1.023495 50.882841,-1.023490 50.882860)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL